Ranking Without Zero And Ranking On Multiple Factors?
Aug 12, 2014
I am facing some problem with ranking formulae. Attached is a file illustrating them.
Problem 1: Ranking without zero I have a set of data for products. They have a number next to it. Some of the products have a ZERO value next to them. I want to rank the data in an ascending order while ignoring the products with ZERO value next to them.
Problem 2: Ranking on multiple factors I have a set of data for 50 products. There are 5 factors based on which I want to pick the best and the worst. Each factor has a value which can be a negative number, zero or positive number.
This is what I am doing presently: Ranking the products on each factor in a separate column. Points are assigned based on the ranking, i.e. if the ranking of "product A" on Factor 1 is 32, then it gets 32 points It is assumed that equal importance [weight] is given to each factor, thus average points is calculated based on ranking of each product on each factor. Average points are again ranked in descending order The top & bottom 10 are picked from this ranking.
Number of products and number of factors can be different for each analysis. Presently I am giving equal importance to the rankings for each of the factors, what if I have to give varied importance [weight] to the factors.
I have to make a hierarchy of my employees, taking in consideration the achievemnt of their target. I'll attach a sample to make it simple to understand. The are 2 classes of factors: Class I and Class II.
- In Class I (witch counts 75% in total results) there are: - New deposit - count 75% from class I - Insurance - count 10% from class I - Investments fund - count 15% from class I - In Class II (witch counts 25% in total results) trere are: - Loan A - count 15% from class II, but the number have a weight of 40% in results, and volume 60% - Loan B - count 75% from class II, but the number have a weight of 75%, while volume have 25% - New clients - count 10% from class II
Now, I have to rank the employees taking in consideration the Deviation for all of the factors above (columns E, H, K, P, Q, V, W, Z).
Ranking values and ranking duplicates the same rank I'm looking to rank a group of numbers that will possibly have duplicate numbers that I want to show as a tie but have no break in the rankings.
I have attached an example worksheet of something that I am working on. My references refer to this sheet.
Column Descriptions: B = agents. C = the agent's supervisor. D = the agent's score. E = the agent's overall rank in comparison to all other agents. *F = the agent's rank in comparison to the other agents on the supervisor's team.
I need a formula (non-VBA) that will fill column F. That is, a formula that will compare agents on a specific team, based on their QA scores. Though the example data range is small, this will be applied to roughly 600 agents, split up among roughly 40 supervisors. I am currently using Excel 2007.
If anybody has any ideas, suggestions, or solutions, I would greatly appreciate the help, as I have been beating my head against the desk in my attempt to figure this out.
I have a project that I am unable to figure out the best way how to accomplish. I have five players on our basketball that are having a contest. Each player took 25 shots. I need to rank each player's shots individually. For instance, Andrew made 24 and 23 (4th and 1st attempts respectively) so he should be 1st and 2nd while Curtis would get 3rd because he was next with 22 made shots on his last attempt.
I would like to rank the numbers multiple columns (columns B thru F) in column G (not shown but understood).
If this is not possible, is there a way to list ALL the numbers in column G using a formula (the number of students will continue to grow so I am unable to simply enter =B2 in cell G2 and restart with =C2 in cell G7 (after five entries) because the number of students will grow.
I have data in a number of columns in Excel which I want to sort on column B, then C, (Then D) however the formula I have entered is sorting based on column C below in ascending rather than descending order, how I can change this
******** ******************** ************************************************************************>Microsoft Excel - Win_calc.xls___Running: 11.0 : OS = Windows XP (F)ile (E)dit (V)iew (I)nsert (O)ptions (T)ools (D)ata (W)indow (H)elp (A)boutQ21= QRSTUVWX21TickerLowestLowest*NameBOALEHBEARSecond*priceSecond*name22AT*US95/BEAR10210095**23ARW*US50/LEH605070**24BSX*US65/LEH666567**25CBS*US53/BEAR/MS555453**HVOL8* [HtmlMaker 2.42] To see the formula in the cells just click on the cells hyperlink or click the Name box PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THIS TABLE IMAGE ON SAME PAGE! OTHEWISE, ERROR OF JavaScript OCCUR.
This is my general template. I get prices from BOA, LEH AND BEAR on the four companies listed. Then I use the Min function to tell me the best price (I'm buying). Then I use some IF statements to tell me who's the "Lowest Name" (lowest price):
It checks if a cell is = the lowest cell value, then returns the header. This formula refers to different columns than my displayed sheet because Im hiding so cells and I just copied this to another section of my sheet. There's probably a better way to do this but this is what I have do far. I use this for 50 company names and 5 or six dealer banks (BOA, LEH, etc)
I'd like column that gives me the Second Place price and one that gives me the associated dealer (BOA, LEH).
I have successfully been able to rank items using two criteria but I'm unsure of the syntax for adding a third or fourth set. I'm new to the use of Sumprodoct.
I have attached a file. Where column C and E have the same value, I want Excel to look at column F and assign a rank (formula is in column K) in ascending order.
copied down to a minimum of 100 rows (names) The AGG is the sum(a:e/5) When u use RANK(agg,agg1:agg100,1) It ties Names AAAA and BBBB as they both have AGG of 0.142. Problem is the rule book states ties are split by the smallest of the results for each competitor in columns A to E. In this example BBBB is 2nd as he has smallest result in Column C being 0.08.
I have tried the AGG+1/min(a:e) and still end up with incorrect results. The problem is the numbers are so small and you have to split ties all the way to the 100th person involved. I cant use sort either as the data has to be printed in alphabeticall name order all the way to 100 names with their ranks recorded against the names.
I have a list of research material based off postcodes, travel time in those areas and what I want to do is rank the the travel times in those ares within a third column.
What I have so far in design terms is this:
Origin Base Time Time Ranking AB10 00:10:00 AB10 00:12:00
[Code]...
So basically I'm trying to have column c look at a and check for the lowest value in b against all other rows that have the same constant value e.g. AB10 in column a. Then to distinguish them somehow for example marking the first '1'. Also then to be able to do it for second and thrid ranking value.
What do people think? Is this doable? I think maybe a min if array but keep tripping on the fact that the ranges are all locked in a single column and inconstant sizes.
The data comes in this format and is quite large so manual editing would be a last resort.
I posted a thread a while ago asking for a formula to rank based on multiple criteria (Rank On Multiple Criteria). The following; = SUMPRODUCT(--($A$2:$A$50=$A2),--($B$2:$B$50=$B2),--($D$2:$D$50=$D2),--($G2>$G$2:$G$50))+1)
works an absoulte treat, however is there a way to modify it so that does not allow duplicates? The data in the G column refers to time values acheived during testing of athletes, the problem arises when two athletes achieve the same score and thus they are ranked the same. However, body mass is also measured (F column) and in essence the athlete with the lower body mass has achived the better score and thus should be ranked accordingly.
I need your kind help with a code that if the cells in the range become 10, then the cell across in column B will rank the order of the cell that scored 10.
ie: if A2=10 then B2=1st, A4=10 then B4 = 2nd, A5=10 then B5=3rd, A1=10 then B1=4th, A3=10 then B3=5th.
The ranking is placed according to the which cell results to 10 first.
i need to rank database and get an output of 1, 2, 3, 4, and ect. even if the first 2 had a tie of 1; 1;. So if i have 500 records and the first 3 are tie at 1st place than the next rank should NOT be 4 but instead should be 2 and so on. Is it possible?
The Excel function RANK allows one to automatically rank a number within a given range of numbers. Can anyone think of a way to do the same thing with words?
For example, imagine a list of 20 words in a column, with space to add ten more words (complete range B2 to B31, which include the last ten blank cells). If these were numbers, then in the previous column one could simply put in the RANK formula covering the full range, which would then auto update as you added more numbers to the spare ten cells of the range. Assuming that all the values being ranked are unique, and you would therefore get a unique rank number, to order them in rank order, one would simply have the list of possible rank values a column or two removed and VLOOKUP the ranks and their appropriate values.
But what if these numbers were WORDS? The first 20 words are FIXED and will not change, the next ten cells of the range could have any other words typed into them. There is no RANK function for words so how would you suggest that ranking by words is achieved, that does not require any intervention, and as new words were added to the spare ten cells in the range, then the rank would automatically update? This list of ranked words would then be VLOOKUP’d in the same fashion as above with the final list being used to fuel a drop down box, so the user would have an alphabetical listing of all the potential words in the range.
I have a spreadsheet which we use to rank scores for our golf society.
At the start of our season it was decided that if anyone of the top 3 scores were tied we would separate them using a second criteria(back nine score). Any scores from position 4 down would still be tied.
From searching this forum i have managed to separate ties using the 'back nine' second criteria(using a hidden helper column) but only for all the ranking positions not just the top 3.
I need to rank sales with Nation, Area and Division. I figure how to calculate National rank, Area but have a bit of an issue with Divisional Rank. I need to re-calculate division rank by looking at Area rank and if this individual already .....
However if you get two scores tied, for example 28, 28, 39, 6, using rank the points score for each 28 returns 2 when I actually need it to be 2.5 (Thats 3points +2points / 2).
i was looking for some assistance in regards to a formula i have used for ranking. i have attached a sample spreadsheet of what i have done so far but struggling to work something so thot id try here.
(Sample WB) Currently i have managed to rank in accordance to column E but as i have alot of 0% i would like to be able to rank the 0% in accordance to the number of work done (column C).
For example i have 62 0% answers and Username Q has actioned 316 jobs with 0 Failures so should be ranked 1st as he has the highest number of jobs.
Is there an equivalent of =rank for non-numerical data? If not, is it possible to sort data (into another column if necessary) alphabetically without resorting to a macro?
I have a list of values that I need to rank in descending order. Usually the RANK function is OK, but here is my problem. I need the list to use 'generous' rules. If there is a tie for 2nd, lets say, then I need the next place to be 3rd, NOT 4th as the RANK function does.
A number of columns (B to U) contain names, details and scores of players. The A column contains the ranking, e.g. 1 to 100.
If a player (row) is deleted, that ranking number is also gone. Is there a way to make the A column always maintain the integrity and completeness of the numbering, e.g. if rank (row) 16 is deleted, the range of B17:U100 moves one row up and the former 17 is now 16? And if a new row is inserted, the ranking numbers after the insertion move up one row and a new number is added at the end?
2. There are 6 columns of scores, P to U. But out of these 6 scores, only the best 4 count for the ranking. The two worst (highest) scores are dropped. Is there a way to automate the process by selecting only the 4 best (lowest) numbers to be summed into the Total column (C), which in turn determines the rankings in the A column?*
And then can the whole range B2:U100 automatically be sorted according to the ranking in column (A)?
*It is possible that there are 3 or 4 bad scores, all with the same value. In that case only 2 could be discarded, and 1 or 2 would be summed into the ranking cell.
I have a data base of numbers Columns C to K with values from Row 2 to 3766. I want to rank each of these columns by value 1 to 100. However, some of the columns will assign 1 to the highest value and 100 to the lowest. In other columns it will be reverse, 1 is given to the lowest value and 100 to the highest. I can do a rank by percentile but that's not the scoring I'm looking for. Also don't know how to reverse assignment of high or low values. One further note, some of the cells are blank in which case I want to assign a neutral score of 50.
im doing a excell sheet for a fantasy league that i ahve created. I have a "total" cell to combine the total points for each player. I then used the "rank" formula to rank the highest points to that player. My question is...can i show like how many points behind everyone else is from who ever the "rank 1" is in?
Not sure if you can do 2 formuals in same cell or not. maybe i could have rank and how many points are behind in same cell
Example. lets say Player points rank Tim 5000 1 Jimmy 4000 2 -1000 Sara 3500 3 -1500
I need to do a final ranking for the employees those who have been already ranked on three different segments. And there will be also employees who are not qualified for the ranking in any one of the three different segments. So in the final ranking need to find the final qualified employees who are ranked in all the segments and we need to rank them, and the employees who are not qualified also has to be mentioned.
I need to be able to rank the numbers in the bottom row above based on the criteria in the yellow above. e.g.
Amoung all m's Phil = _____ Amoung all m's red's Phil = _____ Amoung all m's washer's Phil = _____ Amoung all m's washer's Team1 Phil = _____ etc etc
I began using a series on concatenations and found a nice sumproduct formula that worked well going up and down the column, but how can i do the same going across the columns.
