I have a dateset that I am creating a userform for. The problem is my dataset has more than 32765 rows, usually around 35000. How can I work around getting the "overflow" error when my users click on a selection > the limit imposed on a listbox?
View 3 RepliesI need some assistance with the code below. I have a userform that has a listbox with 2 columns of information. When there is a match between the value in the listbox and the value in the cell for a given row, that row is deleted. I thought this was very straightforward, but i'm not getting this to work right...
Private Sub cmdDelete_Click()
Dim Val2 As String
Dim Val3 As String
Dim doit As Long
Dim roww As Long
Dim LastRow As Long
Val2 = ListBox1.List(ListBox1.ListIndex, 0)
Val3 = ListBox1.List(ListBox1.ListIndex, 1)
doit = MsgBox("Confirm that you want to delete the entry", vbOKCancel)
If doit = vbOK Then
For some reason my selection won't return to where it's supposed to in a listbox after I've increased it's column widths. It's very strange.
I've put together an example of the issue as the actual workbook is enormous, but the demonstration seems to work.
I've tried exporting the Listindex resetting code to an external function, but it didn't help either.
Can anyone understand this behaviour?
I am working in excel 2003. I have a number of combo boxes, and I would like to get the listindex of a given box. It is easy to get the value of the box number "x"
Controls("Combobox" & x).value
works no problem, however
Controls("combobox" & x).listindex
does not work, and while I can do
Combobox1.listindex
I cannot figure out how to make the 1 a variable.
I have a combobox which properly populates the list of items it should display, however upon selecting the item the combobox displays that item's listindex, not the cell contents. I've tried to populate the combobox a couple different ways and the list from which to choose displays properly all the time, but upon selecting I cant get it to stop displaying the listindex.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSo my macro goes through about 30 workbooks--opens them, updates the links, saves, closes. It would work flawlessly except I have to stop and click "continue" when this message pops up for most of the workbooks:
"This workbook contains one or more links that cannot be updated....etc."
About 90% of the workbooks have bad links somewhere (I think in the insert>names...but they're not my workbooks so i can't delete all the names). Since I can't find the bad links, I would like a visual basic script that will automatically click "continue" everytime so that the macro runs its course without me having to do anything. Does anyone know how to do this?
I am wanting to base some calculations on a filtered list, specifically visible cells. Subtotal works great on average and other calcs, but not median. Any way to get a median calc on visible cells?
I can't use sumproduct or ctrl-shift arrays because I don't know of a way to identify if the cell is visible (or hidden).
How do I avoid using arrays? I am reaching Excel 2003's limit.
Our workbook has many worksheets, each with tables generated from queries that have multiple columns. On the first sheet we have arrays that refer to the other worksheets. Such as:
{=SUM(IF(('Prime Change Orders'!G$2:G$10=C17)*('Prime Change Orders'!D$2:D$10
I have a listbox on a form that refers to a dynamic range. The problem I have is that the listindex returned from selecting an item in the listbox returns the same number for an entry of the same value in the first bound column (in this case Col A, see below). I guess it's kind of acting like a primary key if.
My Dynamic Range that shows up In the listbox.
Col A Col B
0700 1500 '<-- returns Listindex = 0
0700 1800 '<-- returns Listindex = 0
0800 1630 '<-- returns Listindex = 1
0800 1830 '<-- returns Listindex = 1
I have some formulas in my workbook that use the weeknum function from the analysis toolpak. I have the analysis toolpak installed, yet every time I save the file and reopen it, the formulas with weeknum are gone, with #N/A in its place as the formula. Sometimes the results of the formula from the last time remain (the cells contain the number of the week, but without the underlying formula), sometimes not. All the other formulas are fine. The formulas are simple, like =WEEKNUM(C2)
I have been trying to save as a 97-2003 .xls file. Today I'm trying to save as .xlsx, but I have to rebuild the formulas first, so I don't know how that's going to turn out.
I am aware that special characters such as -,(,),[,] are not permitted in named ranges (for lists), but is there a workaround for this? I have a lot of dependent lists that need to access names that contain either a - or () or both. I could simply remove the -'s or ()'s using find/replace, but they are required, as they're part of the name. I am aware of this method http://www.contextures.com/xlDataVal02.html#Illegal but I have a lot of dependent lists across a sheet, and a VLOOKUP isn't going to work. If there isn't a workaround, are there any allowed characters I could use to replace the -'s and ()'s?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of reformatting an excel workbook to act as a review tool for different factors in a process. Part of my redesign includes the use of coding that creates different cell colors based upon the cell contents. The new workbooks will be used to handle existing data for this year. I have developed a process macro to open an existing workbook and copy and transfer the original data worksheet into the newly formatted workbook. The data gets transferred to the new worksheet and the resulting workbook is renamed and saved, Heres'' the rub... the newly saved workbook is missing all of the coding for the worksheets... apparently this is a MS bug.
Has anyone figured a workaround for this. One thought I had is to open both( new and old )workbooks and rather than move/copy , i would transfer the data using cell references.
The number of rows you are pasting and then you can select that same number of existing rows and use "insert". This is what I'm trying to achieve:
(before paste)
A
B
C
(after pasting unknown number of rows)
1
2
...
n
A
B
C
Is there really no built-in way to do this?
I am new to macro and just trying to learn. I have a spreadsheet with 20000 rows and 8 columns. I am trying to identify equal rows based on the values of columns C, D, E and F. then I need to separate equal bunches with a blank row. Then I need to copy the ID number from the first cell of column B of each bunch and paste it for the rest of the rows in that bunch. I have written the following code but this does not put the ID of the first cell in a bunch for the rest of the rows in that bunch.
[Code] .........
How do I delete filtered rows without deleting the hidden rows in excel 2010?
View 8 Replies View Relatedcalculate the number of full rows in one data base located on one sheet X to determine how many rows the macro needs to extend on sheet B (sheet B is made only of formulas for data interpretation in sheet A.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a macro which is copying data from several worksheets into one consolidation worksheet. When determining where to paste the data into the consolidation sheet, the macro includes some logic to find the last row that has data in it (using e.Range("A65536").End(xlUp).Row, where "e" is a variable holding the name of the consolidation worksheet).
Once all the data is on the consolidation worksheet, I have a second worksheet with formulas that link to the consolidation sheet. The issue I have is that the first step of my consolidation macro deletes all data on the consolidation sheet to ensure that no data is double-counted). I am deleting the data with logic that simply deletes all rows from 3 to 65536. Once these rows are deleted, Excel returns a #REF! error on my second worksheet which is linking back to this data.
Rather than deleting the rows on the consolidation sheet, I have tried using the Clear and/or ClearContents commands instead. This works (i.e., my formulas no longer error out), but results in the consolidation macro running very slowly (~15 minutes, compared to
The best way to explain my problem is to look at the table below:
How it looks now: ApplePrice 1
Price 2
Price 3FruitDeliciousPearStore 1
Store 2FruitVery DeliciousHow I want it to look:ApplePrice 1FruitDeliciousApplePrice 2FruitDeliciousApplePrice 3FruitDeliciousPearStore 1FruitVery DeliciousPearStore 2FruitVery Delicious
I am trying to average different rows and columns within a larger block data set in a series. This data is from a 96-well absorbance microplate reader experiment. I only mention this to describe the raw data output I am dealing with.
Each set of data is in a 12 x 8 block with the next block below it with one blank row between. So I have a block of data contained between A1->L1->L8. The next block is contained between A10->L10->L17. This continues for a total of 28 blocks.
I want to take averages from rows or columns from each block and autofill them into a single column. So for example I'll need =Average(A1-C1) with =Average(A10-C10) below it and so on and so forth. My problem is that if I try to autofill from this already started column the third row will take the average of A2-C2 instead of A19-C19.
Is there a formula/script for me to skip the correct number of rows to the next data block?
I have attached my spreadsheet to this thread. I am using Excel 2013
FeS_Kinetics.xlsx
I have an excel file with a table in it. It contains 2051 records (attached). This is just a sample, the original file has around 30,000 rows.
When I start using filters, I run into problems:
Step 1: Filter by Unit, condition (e.g.) Unit_23
Excel shows in the status bar the following message: 437 of 2050 records found.
Step 2: If I scroll to the bottom of the table, the row numbers are colored in blue (normal for a filtered list) however the last row is not colored and it actually should not be shown since its unit is not what I filtered for (its unit is Unit_25)
Step 3: Clear the filter of Unit
Step 4: Sometimes (depending on what I filter for), one or more of the bottom rows are hidden!!!
Attachment 301726
I need to build a macro which copies 3 rows every day and pastes the row data into an identical sheet. The three rows will have column "D" as =today(). As the days progress the three rows will change accordingly ( tag to the today's date)
e.g. 28/1/2014
28/1/2014
28/1/2014
I need the macro to recognize the date when pressed and copy the corresponding rows of data and paste them into an identical sheet with the same date. The second sheet is an archive sheet. The date will tick over as per the calendar.
I would like to have my macro code search column A (supplier numbers) and split the rows into groups of rows of 5 or less and then insert 3 blank rows between each group of rows. The split needs to start on a new supplier number and cannot split a supplier number into two different groups. Here is a sample:
Supplier
Invoice Date
GL Date
Invoice Amt
[Code].....
I am an undergraduate biology major working on a geometric morphometrics project. It is focusing on wing asymmetry, so I have data for the left and the right wings for a sample population of 30 individuals. The data from the software is exported as a spreadsheet with two rows of data for each individual, since each wing was calculated separately, and my mentor has asked me to average the data for subsequent analyses in another program.
I'd like to do this easily with an Excel formula, but when I try to do the averages I'm having a little trouble getting the formula to carry on correctly. I need it to average, say, E2:E3 then the next cell average E4:E5, but instead the only thing I can get it to do is average E2:E3 then the next cell do E3:E4. Which obviously doesn't work for me, since E3:E4 is data from two different individuals.
Is there a way I can do this for my data? One of my spreadsheets is a 60x32 matrix of landmark coordinates, so I'd really rather not try to do all the cells individually.
I am working in the attached spreadsheet. For anyone who does not wish to open the link, let's say these sheets are titled 'Sheet1' and 'Sheet2'.
Sheet2 looks like this:
Year Cat Name
2013 4 Sal
2013 4 Pat
2013 3 Pat
[Code]....
Now, how may I pull this data into a summary sheet (Sheet1) that skips over any instances where column A ("Year") is blank so it looks like this:
Year Cat Name
2013 4 Sal
2013 4 Pat
2013 3 Pat
2013 2 Pat
2013 5 Bob
[Code]...
Note: All columns are the EXACT same across each sheet(including Sheet1, Sheet2, Sheet3), if that extra piece of information works.
PS It is fine if, in order for a formula to work, I need to copy and paste the formula for the length of rows per each Sheet to consolidate.
EDIT:
So, in my industry, any summary-level data (shown on Sheet1) must have a linked reference to a particular sheet (Sheet2, Sheet3, etc.) so the user knows where the raw data came from. This is to ensure increased accuracy of data and minimize human error (like, if for example, I accidentally didn't copy and paste all the rows correctly).
I have uploaded the actual sheet to show what the data actually look like. I am trying to pull in 2013 data into my "Summary Page" and would like to have all the data linked to the '2013' sheet but skip any blank rows.
Here is my failed formula:
=INDEX('2013'!F$3:F$338,SMALL(IF('2013'!$E$3:$E$338<>"",ROW('2013'!$E$2:$E$338)-ROW('2013'!$E$2:$E$338)+1,ROWS(B$1:B1)),""))
removing duplicate rows and move other data frm rows to columns.xlsx.
I am attaching a sample excel sheet showing what I need to do.In the first tab, I have a list that includes duplicate rows (first column only). I want to remove those duplicate rows but I don't want to lose the data in the following columns which can be unique or duplicates as well.
see the desired result tab in the sheet to get an idea of what I am looking for as the end result.
Keep in mind that the actual source file I am working with could have up to 50000 row, and the expected results could be around 2000 rows. So nothing can be done manually.
I am working with an excel spreadsheet. There is a column for "name", and then the next column is for medical condition.
If the same patient has multiple (say, 4) conditions, the rows for "name" are combined into a single cell(let's say, a cell going from row 2 to row 5, witha a single name in the combined cell) , with the next column having four different cells adjacent to the single cell (cell 2 has "bleeding", cell 3 has "fever", cell 4 has "diarrhea", and cell 5 has "rash"). Some patients have only single conditions, single cells.
Will this mess up COUNTS and COUNTIF?
Is there a way to split the combined cell2-5 for ''name" into four cells all containing the same name?
In my excel I'm copying rows upon specific criteria to another tab.
The question is how I can delete copied rows and update the original tab without empty rows? (N of rows is always changing)
1. I have to hide rows using checkboxes
2. I have to copy visible rows (not marked ones) to another sheet in the same workbook. So far i have managet to creat this code for hiding/sowing rows:
I have data in B4:B55 and need a formula to return a count of rows, including rows that are blank. However, there are hidden rows that need to be omitted from the count.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a spread sheet with values in the area of A1:H834
In column H, I have number values from 1-7.
Essentially that number value means that the values in the row are duplicate.
So, for example, if H2 has a value of 4, that means that $A$2:$G$2, really should have an additional 3 rows underneath with the EXACT same data in each cell, however, the way the sheet was created, was to remove the duplicate values and just indicate in column H, the number value of how many duplicates $A$2:$G$2 really is.
I need to unpackage this and create what it was originally. What type of formula can I use, to look at the value in H2, and then insert underneath that number of rowes with the exact same data as A2:G2 and do the same for the remainder of the table all the way down to A834:G834