Ranking values and ranking duplicates the same rank I'm looking to rank a group of numbers that will possibly have duplicate numbers that I want to show as a tie but have no break in the rankings.
I need to rank sales with Nation, Area and Division. I figure how to calculate National rank, Area but have a bit of an issue with Divisional Rank. I need to re-calculate division rank by looking at Area rank and if this individual already .....
I have a table of data where i want to rank scores. I know the general formula for this would be =RANK(B2,$B$2:$B$7) as an example however the range of data is not next to each other and I have tried this formula =RANK(B2,B2,B4,B6) but this comes up with an error.
I am wanting to rank mulitple groups of data and as i do this daily and the size of the groups are constantly changing there is a lot of manual moving cell sizes around to get what i need. i am hopeing there is a simpler way...
An example is say a horse race info i have
race tab score 2 1 10 2 2 6 2 3 8 2 4 12 2 5 9
3 1 7 3 2 12 3 3 8 3 4 15
i have been using =rank($C2,$C$2:$C6) so i am trying to rank the scores...... ETC and i know this locks sells but if i take dollar signs away the next row doesnt rank A3 from A2:A6 and i also want to be able to drag down so the formula will then do race 3 etc....
is there a way i can do a lookup + rank so my formula ranks all numbers relating to race 2 then goes on to rank numbers relating to race 3 ?
I will also have to add the track name i guess as each individual track has race 1, 2, 3 etc
Would someone be so kind as to look at the attcahed sheet. There are boxes with data entered. Depending on the achievement the 3 parties are automatically ranked 1,2 or 3 as you can see.
All except for cells j23:j25, although I've used exactly the same formula as the other boxes, the ranking doesn't seem to work for some reason I cannoot fathom.
I know there is an issue with merging, but all the others work and are merged (to get them to work I created the formula before merging).
I have 6 categories that need to be ranked 1-6 in order of highest number of occurances. My ranking formula is showing 1-7, missing number 3. I have attached a sample worksheet further showing what I am trying to explain. I need cell A3 to show a ranking of "3". Currently it shows "4". What am I doing wrong??
I am facing some problem with ranking formulae. Attached is a file illustrating them.
Problem 1: Ranking without zero I have a set of data for products. They have a number next to it. Some of the products have a ZERO value next to them. I want to rank the data in an ascending order while ignoring the products with ZERO value next to them.
Problem 2: Ranking on multiple factors I have a set of data for 50 products. There are 5 factors based on which I want to pick the best and the worst. Each factor has a value which can be a negative number, zero or positive number.
This is what I am doing presently: Ranking the products on each factor in a separate column. Points are assigned based on the ranking, i.e. if the ranking of "product A" on Factor 1 is 32, then it gets 32 points It is assumed that equal importance [weight] is given to each factor, thus average points is calculated based on ranking of each product on each factor. Average points are again ranked in descending order The top & bottom 10 are picked from this ranking.
Number of products and number of factors can be different for each analysis. Presently I am giving equal importance to the rankings for each of the factors, what if I have to give varied importance [weight] to the factors.
I am attempting to upgrade a scoring system in excel 2003 which I use to rank wins in a sports results grid and i have to amend a formula based on a new version. The current formula in the attached part-completed worksheet Draw9 of 1 to 9, which I wish to amend, is in cells AM42:53 one of which is:
I have now added an extra column of data in cell AN44:53 under “LSD” and I would like to use this to improve the accuracy of the original ranking. In other words I wish to Rank teams using the “Wins” in column AL42:53 plus the “LSD” data in columns AN44:53 and this will ensure that where teams are tied on the same number of wins then the numbers in the “LSD” column will enable a clear ranking i.e. say 3 teams on 3 wins ranked 6th = will now be ranked 6th,7th & 8th.
I had tried ranking formula to rank employees on some cirteria it was working, but if there is any tie between two employees then the next rank is not displaying for example in Ach Rank : rank 5 is missing because there is tie is between two employees is rank 4. Request your suggestion and help on this for overcoming the issue.
Formula used for ranking : =IF(B2>=75%,RANK(B2,$B$2:$B$41,1)-COUNTIF($B$2:$B$41,"
In the attached spreadsheet I track the performance of my team. I enter the AHT for my team in the work sheet named "AHT Summary".I keep updating this data every month. automatically sort the updated data and rank the agents based on their average AHT. The person with the lowest AHT should be ranked 1. Column is highlighed in green for your reference. Based on this ranking the work sheet named "Ranking" should be updated automatically. Since I am taking a weighted average for all agents, the one who gets the lowest AHT should be ranked 1st . In the ranking work sheet the agent with ranking 1 should be given 100, the second highest ranked person should get 98,third 96,fourth 94 etc.
I have a workbook of data that I created a pivot table with. From there I need to rank each value of the NES, column C, within the corresponding Reporting Structure, column A. The table that I created will be update with data on a monthly basis and I don't want to have to redo the rankings every month and just have it refresh.
I am trying to rank via data in two columns to eliminate any tied rankings.
I need to use the data in columns "AW" & "AX" to compile the rankings.
The ranking needs to be calculated by the highest number in column "AW" being ranked #1 and the second highest ranked #2 etc etc......any ties as a result of this ranking need to be broken by the lowest number in column "AX", the lower number being the higher in value and thus being the higher ranked.
the numerical data under the colors is the cost to make an item that color. i need a way to say that i have "n" of each color available to make and then a way to tell me which items to make which color for the lowest cost.
Column A - List of students Names Column B - Grades of Students Column C - Rank
The problem is, when I rank the students (order highest to lowest) the data in A and/or in B also moves.
What I want to accomplish is that the data input in columns A and B stay as is and Column C shall indicate what is the ranking of that student according to the number of data entry. i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 1,2,3 respectively.
I have 4,300 cells populated with data. I have sorted the data and now I need to rank the data in 1% increments. For example, the first 1% of data (43 cells) will be ranked #1, the second 1% of data (43 cells) will be ranked #2 etc. How could I automate this process? I was trying to figure something out with the "Rank" command but that doesn't seem to work in this situation.
I have a spreadsheet with a list of ID's in column A. In Column B I have a list of ratings. Each ID has more than one rating. For example there may be 8 rows with ID 1, 12 rows with ID 2, 6 rows with ID 3 etc......
I want to rank the ratings in Column B with highest being 1 but only when the ID's are the same. For example there would be 8 ratings ranked for ID 1, 12 for ID 2 etc.....
The problem is I am running a monte carlo simulation on the rating of around 10,000 simulations. Every simulation the rank for each row will of course change because the rating has changed. The spreadsheet has around 70,000 rows and over 3000 ID's.
How can I do this without either the computer becoming a crawl or freezing up and it not taking 30 minutes for each step of the simulation?
I'm trying to achieve a table of weighted ranking based on correlations, a table I already have like the one given below
John / Products Owned 1 2 3 4 Shoes Socks Polish Brush Lace Trousers Shoes Socks Belt Polish Wallet Belt Trousers Shoes Socks
What I'm trying to achieve is this:
for all the top 4 correlations given for each product owned, i need to consider the ones not owned by John and recommend overall rank of the following nature:
For instance, the rank of socks here will be (1+2+4)/3 = 2.33, the rank of belt will be (5+3+1)/3 = 3 [ I'm considering the rank of belt as 5 for shoes, since it doesn't occur in the top 4 ]. Shoes, here will not be ranked since it is already owned by John.
I'm struggling to translate the logic into code here. Currently I perform it in a cumbersome manner, copying all columns to one column, then performing a pivot to find repetitions and so on.
Perhaps there's a function that could scan a dynamic sized table here, find the unique items and number of times they're repeated?
I am looking for a ranking formula that will pull the data from the first column based on the ranking of the second column so that the end result will look like this 1 S 2 F 3 D As S has the largest quantity, F 2nd largest etc
The list I will pull this from is variable in length but in the hundreds.
I need your kind help with a code that if the cells in the range become 10, then the cell across in column B will rank the order of the cell that scored 10.
ie: if A2=10 then B2=1st, A4=10 then B4 = 2nd, A5=10 then B5=3rd, A1=10 then B1=4th, A3=10 then B3=5th.
The ranking is placed according to the which cell results to 10 first.
i need to rank database and get an output of 1, 2, 3, 4, and ect. even if the first 2 had a tie of 1; 1;. So if i have 500 records and the first 3 are tie at 1st place than the next rank should NOT be 4 but instead should be 2 and so on. Is it possible?
The Excel function RANK allows one to automatically rank a number within a given range of numbers. Can anyone think of a way to do the same thing with words?
For example, imagine a list of 20 words in a column, with space to add ten more words (complete range B2 to B31, which include the last ten blank cells). If these were numbers, then in the previous column one could simply put in the RANK formula covering the full range, which would then auto update as you added more numbers to the spare ten cells of the range. Assuming that all the values being ranked are unique, and you would therefore get a unique rank number, to order them in rank order, one would simply have the list of possible rank values a column or two removed and VLOOKUP the ranks and their appropriate values.
But what if these numbers were WORDS? The first 20 words are FIXED and will not change, the next ten cells of the range could have any other words typed into them. There is no RANK function for words so how would you suggest that ranking by words is achieved, that does not require any intervention, and as new words were added to the spare ten cells in the range, then the rank would automatically update? This list of ranked words would then be VLOOKUP’d in the same fashion as above with the final list being used to fuel a drop down box, so the user would have an alphabetical listing of all the potential words in the range.
I have a spreadsheet which we use to rank scores for our golf society.
At the start of our season it was decided that if anyone of the top 3 scores were tied we would separate them using a second criteria(back nine score). Any scores from position 4 down would still be tied.
From searching this forum i have managed to separate ties using the 'back nine' second criteria(using a hidden helper column) but only for all the ranking positions not just the top 3.
However if you get two scores tied, for example 28, 28, 39, 6, using rank the points score for each 28 returns 2 when I actually need it to be 2.5 (Thats 3points +2points / 2).
i was looking for some assistance in regards to a formula i have used for ranking. i have attached a sample spreadsheet of what i have done so far but struggling to work something so thot id try here.
(Sample WB) Currently i have managed to rank in accordance to column E but as i have alot of 0% i would like to be able to rank the 0% in accordance to the number of work done (column C).
For example i have 62 0% answers and Username Q has actioned 316 jobs with 0 Failures so should be ranked 1st as he has the highest number of jobs.
Is there an equivalent of =rank for non-numerical data? If not, is it possible to sort data (into another column if necessary) alphabetically without resorting to a macro?